Category Archives: Business & Politics

The extraordinary threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs, including deadly fentanyl, constitutes a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Until the crisis is alleviated, President Donald J. Trump is implementing a 25% additional tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% additional tariff on imports from China. Energy resources from Canada will have a lower 10% tariff. President Trump is taking bold action to hold Mexico, Canada, and China accountable to their promises of halting illegal immigration and stopping poisonous fentanyl and other drugs from flowing into our country. The orders make clear that the flow of contraband drugs like fentanyl to the United States, through illicit distribution networks, has created a national emergency, including a public health crisis. …”This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!”

In related coverage in:

• The Hill: Trump says potential pain caused by tariffs ‘worth the price’
• The Hill: Trump to speak with Trudeau, Mexico after imposing tariffs

The Government of Canada is moving forward with 25 per cent tariffs on $155 billion worth of goods in response to the unjustified and unreasonable tariffs imposed by the United States on Canadian goods. These countermeasures have one goal: to protect and defend Canada’s interests, consumers, workers, and businesses. The first phase of our response will include tariffs on $30 billion in goods imported from the U.S., effective February 4, 2025, when the U.S tariffs are applied. …Minister LeBlanc also announced that the government intends to impose tariffs on an additional list of imported U.S. goods worth $125 billion. A full list of these goods will be made available for a 21-day public comment period. …In addition to this initial response, Ministers LeBlanc and Joly reiterated that all options remain on the table. …Less than 1 per cent of the fentanyl and illegal crossings into the United States come from Canada.

Related coverage in:

• CBC News: Justin Trudeau announces 25% retaliatory tariffs on US products
• Government of Canada: US products subject to 25% tariffs effective Feb 4

President Trump conceded Sunday that there may be “some pain” from his sweeping tariffs on Mexico and Canada, but they will eventually lead to a new “GOLDEN AGE.” Nice of him to promise a glorious future because the pain is already unfolding. …He also included a blast at these columns for leading the “Tariff Lobby” after our editorial called his 25% across-the-board tariffs on our friends and neighbors “the dumbest trade war in history.” …But bad policy has damaging consequences, whether or not Mr. Trump chooses to admit it. Tariffs are taxes, and when you tax something you get less of it. …The hammer blow to Mexico and Canada shows that no country or industry is safe. …This will cause friends and foes to recalibrate their dependence on America’s market. How this helps the US isn’t apparent, so, yes, “dumbest trade war” sounds right, if it isn’t an understatement. [A Wall Street Journal subscription is required to read the full story]

Related Economic Coverage in:

• RBC Economics: A US-Canada trade shock now in play: first economic takeaways
• The Economist: The three victims of Trump’s trade ware use different playbooks
• PBS News: The potential economic effects of Trump’s trade war in 9 charts
• The Economic Times: $1.4 Trillion: The true cost of Trump’s tariffs for Americans

David Frum

To understand the harm Donald Trump has done with his tariffs on Canada and Mexico, here are four things you need to know: First, every tax on imports is also a tax on exports. …Trump tariffs will be paid in the form of higher prices for imports and their substitutes, and lower profits and wages for everyone who works in export industries. Second, every product is also an input. …Big, sophisticated global companies can shift their input-sourcing but the shift is never easy. For smaller companies, it may prove altogether unfeasible. …Third, “illegal” is irrelevant; don’t expect relief from tariffs through lawsuits. The US has sabotaged the dispute-settlement mechanisms under the North American trade agreements. …Fourth, Americans may not remember their past actions, but others do. …Trump is single-handedly reneging on 80 years of American work to persuade others to trust and rely on the US. …“America First” means “America Alone.” [A subscription to the Economist is required to read the full story]

In Relate Opinion Coverage by:

• The National Post’s John Ivison: Canada is on the receiving end of a hostile act
• The Economist: America will never be as efficient at making cars as it is now
• Daniel Drache & Mark Froese in the Conversation: The brute power of an imperial presidency

David Eby

BC Premier David Eby announced immediate countermeasures to U.S. tariffs on Saturday, including banning ‘red-state’ American liquor from public stores. He says the province will also fast-track permits for local projects and expand trade beyond the US to reduce reliance on its market. “We have targeted red states because, quite frankly, Donald Trump doesn’t care about Democrat states,” said Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon. “We want to make sure that we’re not punishing states that have nothing to do with this.” …John Brink, who employs about 400 people in northern B.C. through his group of lumber-focused companies says his business is already feeling the impact. …Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke says she wrote to Eby Sunday morning urging him to implement tax cuts and roll out a comprehensive relief package, similar to what was introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, to support businesses and families.

Related Provincial coverage from:

• Journal of Commerce: BC forestry, lumber industries condemn Trump tariffs
• Business groups: Both sides sound the alarm over Trump’s incoming tariffs
• Quebec’s François Legault: Trump decided to attack. We must stand up and fight.
• Ontario’s Doug Ford: Ontario Premier Doug Ford responds to US tariffs
• New York state’s Kathy Hochul: We don’t need a backdoor tax disguised as a tariff
• Washington State Industry Leaders fear higher costs, tougher exports due to tariffs

Northern Ontario’s softwood lumber industry would be decimated if Trump implements a tariff on Canadian goods said Wendy Landry, president of the Northern Ontario Municipal Association and mayor of Shuniah. …Ian Dunn, CEO of the Ontario Forest Industries Association (OFIA) said softwood lumber duties are expected to double this year, as well, to about 30%-35%. “In reality, Ontario lumber producers could face 60% tariffs at the border, which would effectively wipe out all US shipments,” Dunn said. “In terms of global exports, Ontario exports about $7.9 billion of forest products per year. 79% of that goes to the US,” he said. “Sawmills produce lumber, but they also produce residuals which are consumed by the pulp and paper mills.”  “If there’s additional impacts, and there’s less production at the sawmills, there is less raw material for the pulp and paper mills,” he said.

In related forest sector coverage:

• United Steelworkers: David McCall calls on Trump to reconsider tariffs on Canada
• Forest Products Association of Canada: Derek Nighbor responded to US tariffs
• BC Council of Forest Industries: COFI opposes the US government’s tariff decision
• BC Lumber Trade Council: US Lumber Tariffs are Unjustified and Harmful
• Tom Sundher in the Vancouver Sun: If my US customers want the wood, they’ll have to pay the tariffs
• Ontario Forest Industries Association: Additional tariffs present a looming crisis to Ontario

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump says he will decide Thursday night whether to include oil in his tariff plan as he confirmed his intention to impose devastating duties on Canadian imports on Saturday. …Trump initially claimed his 25 per cent tariff threat was in response to what he called the failure by Canada and Mexico to curb the illegal flow of people and drugs across the border. His complaints have since expanded far beyond border security. On Thursday, Trump repeated his objections to trade deficits with both countries. …Canadian officials are still hoping a final diplomatic push aimed at lawmakers in Washington and Trump’s team can sway the president. …Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc described Canada’s border security efforts to Howard Lutnick. …Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly is in Washington. …Public Safety Minister David McGuinty and Immigration Minister Marc Miller were travelling to Washington.

Related coverage by:

• Pau Pujolas, McMaster University: How can Canada respond to US tariff threat? 
• Mark Zacharias in BIV: Knee-jerk reaction no recipe for BC’s ‘clean energy’ success

President Trump’s advisers are considering several offramps to avoid enacting the universal tariffs on Mexico and Canada that he had pledged, according to people familiar with the matter, even as he reiterated Thursday that the tariffs are coming. The situation is fluid and Trump still may go through with his 25% across-the-board levies. …But amid ongoing negotiations, the administration appears undecided on whether to impose tariffs on all imports from those countries, adding that officials are preparing to opt for more targeted measures instead. Trump is still likely to announce some sort of trade action by Saturday, but it may only affect certain sectors, such as steel and aluminum. Trump may also include major exemptions, such as oil. And the tariffs could be issued using existing legal authorities instead of more novel approaches officials had previously floated. …The administration could also announce new tariffs with a grace period, allowing negotiations to continue.

Related in the New York Times: The World Economy Awaits Trump’s First Round of Tariffs

President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Commerce Department said Mexico and Canada can avoid new tariffs due this weekend if they clamp down on border security — while also signalling that Trump is likely to impose widespread new levies to return manufacturing to US soil. The testimony from Howard Lutnick provides the latest clues of how the Trump administration will roll out a flurry of threatened new levies. …Trump has ordered a study of overall trade issues and tariffs to be finished by April 1. Lutnick described that process as broader, while saying the immediate 25% tariffs Trump has pledged is related to migration and fentanyl issues. “If we are your biggest trading partner, show us the respect, shut your border,” he said. “And as far as I know, they are acting swiftly, and if they execute it, there will be no tariff. And if they don’t, then there will be.”

Related coverage in:

• CBC News: Trump team details two phases of tariff threats on Canada
• Edmonton Journal: Canada may avoid initial Trump tariffs but threat far from over
• Global News: How a trade war and US tariffs could hit Canada’s housing market

Zoltan van Heyningen

Since 2016, U.S. mills have added eight billion board feet of production capacity and produced 30 billion additional board feet of softwood lumber, more than offsetting the decline in unfairly traded Canadian imports. This strengthening of domestic supply lines to build American homes with American lumber would not have happened without strong enforcement of the U.S. trade laws, which work to level the playing field against subsidized and dumped imports. …Total cost of lumber to the builder in an average new home is only about 1.3%. It simply is not credible to state that lumber cost drives housing affordability. “We were disappointed reading the recent The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Opinion” stated Andrew Miller, Chairman of the U.S. Lumber Coalition, and President and CEO of Stimson Lumber Company. …“Canada overproduces softwood lumber for the sole purpose of maintaining employment in Canada, and they unload their oversupply of lumber into the U.S. market at the expense of American jobs, companies and their communities.”

Recently, the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board published a piece titled “Trump’s Lumber Tariffs and Disaster Recovery,” which, among other assertions, claimed that “border taxes on imports from Canada will slow rebuilding in Los Angeles and North Carolina.” That notion did not sit well with the U.S. Lumber Coalition. The group… quickly fired back at WSJ. …WSJ, meanwhile, argued: “The U.S. doesn’t produce enough lumber to meet domestic demand and thus imports about a third of the softwood used in home construction, mostly from Canada.” It goes on to make the case that slapping tariffs on Canadian lumber, which President Trump has vowed to do (to the tune of 25 percent), would exponentially raise prices on homes and rebuilding efforts that are already experiencing spiraling costs. The U.S. Lumber Coalition sees the situation quite differently. It claims there’s an easy fix here — and that’s for Canada to “trade fairly.” 

Trump’s threats to Canada may be repulsive, but they are unfortunately very real. …This is a time for aggressive leadership. Policymakers focused on “win-wins” or reactive strategies must rethink their approach. …Canada produces many products and services upon which the United States depends. Canadian goods generate enormous “consumer surplus” for Americans, all of which could be lost if the price of these goods rises. The 25% tariff threats are troubling for Canadians, but they are equally alarming for those in the U.S. who rely on Canadian products. …Canada should impose an export tax of US$800/MBF, effectively doubling the price. This move would immediately increase the cost of lumber in the U.S., making the risks of a trade war with Canada clear to American consumers. The Canadian forest products industry will likely be the first to oppose this proposal. However, there’s a simple solution… redistribute the revenue from the export tax back to Canadian lumber exporters. 

CALGARY, Alberta – Canadian Pacific Kansas City said it has reached a tentative four-year collective agreement with Unifor representing approximately 1,200 employees at CPKC in Canada. “We are pleased to have reached a tentative collective agreement at the negotiating table with our mechanical employees in Canada,” said Keith Creel, CPKC President and Chief Executive Officer. “By working collaboratively together with Unifor, we have reached an agreement benefiting our employees and their families while continuing to serve the needs of our customers and keeping the Canadian economy moving forward.” Unifor represents mechanics, labourers, diesel service attendants and mechanical support staff.

Having already forced Colombia to accept deportees by threatening a 25% tariff, President Donald Trump is readying the same move against Canada and Mexico as soon as Saturday. But this time, the stakes are higher and many economists surveying the possible damage doubt Trump would be comfortable with self-inflicted wounds from the tariffs. Trump has repeatedly insisted that tariffs on Canada and Mexico are about illegal border crossings and the smuggling of fentanyl. But the Republican president is also motivated by the idea that tariffs would force other countries to “respect” the US. …The economics division of the insurance company Nationwide estimated that Trump’s proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico would increase inflation by as much as 0.5 percentage points and pull down growth by 0.7 percentage points. The analysis noted it did not “account for potential retaliatory tariffs from Canada or Mexico, which could amplify the deleterious impact.”

The federal government is planning a multibillion-dollar, pandemic-style bailout for workers and businesses if U.S. President Donald Trump follows through on his threat to impose 25% tariffs on Canadian goods. The sources said some of the measures, such as waiving the one-week waiting period for employment insurance benefits, do not require parliamentary approval. But the bulk of potential spending on new programs to help laid-off workers and businesses affected by tariffs will require legislative approval, which could not take place until Parliament resumes sitting on March 24. …One of the sources said the federal cabinet is of the opinion that billions of dollars of aid do not need to flow immediately. …The source said the aid package could be ready to roll out once Parliament resumes. But it would require co-operation from the opposition parties. [to access the full story, a Globe and Mail subscription is required]

In related coverage by Tony Keller in the Globe and Mail: Would Trump tariffs ‘kill the Canadian economy completely’? Not even close

President Trump said, “We don’t need Canada to make our cars. We don’t need their lumber because we have our own forests,” he said. “We don’t need their oil and gas.” Mr. Trump is wrong on all three, but we’ll focus on lumber. The U.S. doesn’t produce enough lumber to meet domestic demand and thus imports about a third of the softwood used in home construction, mostly from Canada. …Mr. Trump’s tariff threat has created uncertainty for lumber wholesalers and contractors that could delay rebuilding. The U.S. can’t ramp up lumber production in the near term to meet domestic demand, so contractors will have to eat the tariff cost on lumber from Canada or import more from other countries, which would be expensive. If Mr. Trump wants to increase U.S. lumber production, he could open up more federal land for logging. …More tariffs will punish Americans trying to rebuild. [to access the full story a WSJ subscription is required]

If Donald Trump’s first term was a comedy of errors, this one is already a horror show with a supporting cast of villains and Canada as an intended victim. The U.S. president made a rash of dangerous promises to get elected and just nine weeks in he is stalking his northern neighbour with a vengeance. …The hubris here is breathtaking. A century-and-a-half of proximate friendship and mutual dependence is in danger of evaporating. …The U.S. does need Canadian lumber. Canada is one of the world’s largest producers and exporters of softwood lumber. In 2023, the U.S. imported 28.1 million cubic meters of softwood lumber from Canada – 30% of its supply – primarily for residential and commercial construction. Other sources such as Germany and Sweden can’t hope to match Canadian output. …The U.S. does need Canadian oil. …The U.S. does need Canadian natural gas. …The U.S. doesn’t need Canadian automobiles per se but it does need Canadian automakers.

Additional coverage in Prince George Daily News, by Peter Ewart: Which way Canada in the face of US tariffs?