Category Archives: Wood, Paper & Green Building

Vietnam – The Vn-WoodID application has been officially launched, becoming a key tool contributing to wood traceability. The application, launched within the framework of the “Ensuring Timber Legality for Sustainable Forestry Development in Vietnam” forum on September 12, integrates artificial intelligence (AI) and is capable of analysing images of wood cross-sections, providing identification results with an accuracy of up to 98.6% in less than one second. A prominent feature of Vn-WoodID is its ability to operate directly on a phone without an internet connection. This allows customs officials, forest rangers, or businesses to use it immediately on-site to look up information about wood species, rather than taking days to send samples for identification as was previously required. The application was built using nearly 3,000 wood samples collected from various high-risk areas for origin, such as Africa, South America, and Asia. …expanding the database is crucial to enhancing the application’s effectiveness. 

Andrew Orriss

Andrew Oriss, CEO of the Structural Timber Association, explains how the UK government’s 2025 Construction Products Reform Green Paper will reshape timber specification – from risk-based regulation and strengthened certification to digital product data and sustainability reporting – and what architects and specifiers need to know to stay compliant and competitive. The UK government’s 2025 Construction Products Reform Green Paper represents a pivotal moment for architects and specifiers working with timber and timber frame systems. …The proposed shift towards risk-based regulation offers architects greater clarity when specifying timber systems. Rather than applying blanket restrictions, the new framework will recognise that different timber applications carry different risk profiles. When specifying timber frame for low-rise residential projects, architects will have clearer guidance on what is appropriate compared to specifying mass timber systems for larger commercial buildings. This nuanced approach will enable evidence-based design decisions, moving beyond outdated perceptions to focus on actual performance data.

@Fukushima United FC

While Fukushima is sadly more widely associated with nuclear tragedy … this may soon change as Japan prepares to unveil a new landmark: a circular timber stadium. Designed by Japanese architecture studio Vuild, the venue, which has 5,000 seats, will be the new home of Fukushima United FC. The 16-metre-tall, two-tiered structure was designed … to be a ‘symbol of hope and recovery’ for a region that has been profoundly affected by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, which resulted in a nuclear disaster. The architects have framed the project as a gesture of resilience … drawing on circular principles of reuse and regeneration … with each component designed for disassembly and reuse. …The extensive use of laminated timber rather than concrete or steel is possible because each of the stadium’s four sections covers less than 3,000 square metres. According to Japanese regulations, this exempts the structure from being classified as a fireproof building, thus enabling the pioneering all-wood design.

Additional coverage (in Japanese!): 日本初の完全木造＆世界初の循環型木造スタジアム構想-

This overview traces the modern history of wood science and technology, particularly from the European perspective. It begins with the early forestry schools in 18th-century Germany, which influenced the founding of similar institutions worldwide. These schools introduced technical subjects, including wood physics, to meet industrial demand, especially from the mining sector. Before formal studies began, early research on wood properties, including moisture relations and strength, appeared in encyclopaedias. With the Industrial Revolution, interest in wood as a construction material grew, linking wood research to engineering and materials science. In the early 20th century, dedicated wood technology institutes marked the birth of wood science as a distinct discipline. …The future of wood science lies in sustainability and the efficient use of resources. As interest in renewable, bio-based alternatives to steel and concrete grows, further research on wood functionalisation and modification will be vital. 

The Danish timber industry is warning of significant financial strain following the introduction of new packaging regulations, which came into effect on 1 January as part of the EU’s packaging directive. According to the Danish Wood Packaging Association (DTE), the rules on extended producer responsibility place the cost burden on manufacturers, even when customers dictate the design and specifications. DTE argues this “uneven” implementation could cost the sector over DKK 60 million annually, with pallet prices expected to rise by around 20%. …The association also criticised the fee structure, claiming it relies on outdated data and fails to differentiate between clean, recyclable wood and mixed wood waste, unnecessarily inflating costs and threatening Danish jobs. DTE is calling for reforms to align payment with design responsibility, adjust fees based on environmental impact, and ensure imported packaging is subject to the same standards.

THE majority of consumers cannot identify the primary cause of deforestation – with an increasing number linking it to timber production. That’s going by the results of a major survey from the paper and pulp industry, which also found that more than 60 per cent of people believe only recycled paper should be used to produce new paper products. In contrast, 60 per cent of European consumers believe urban development poses the greatest threat, an increase from 55 per cent in both 2021 and 2023. 58 per cent believe palm oil plantations (up from 52 per cent in 2023), 54 per cent think construction and timber (up from 52 per cent in 2023), 52 per cent believe energy and wood fuel (slightly down from 54 per cent), and 46 per cent deem the paper and pulp industry is the most significant contributor – up from 42 per cent in 2023. …In reality, deforestation is primarily driven by agricultural expansion, especially in tropical and sub-tropical regions.

Timber roof trusses have the lowest climate impact across all measured span lengths when compared to concrete, steel, and glulam options. A study conducted by Zeina Alasadi and Selma Bergström Denizoglu at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, shows that nail plate connected timber trusses consistently outperform other materials in reducing CO₂ emissions, even when more timber units are required to match the span coverage of a single truss made from concrete or steel. The analysis covered trusses with spans from 6 to 26 meters and focused exclusively on emissions from the production phase, using life cycle assessment (LCA) data corresponding to stages A1–A3. The timber trusses were evaluated using verified environmental product declarations (EPDs) from Derome, which supplied design specifications and material volumes. Timber trusses with spans of 6, 8, 12, and 20 meters generated CO₂ emissions of 59.72 kg, 78.5 kg, 145.15 kg, and 352.5 kg respectively when scaled to match standard center distances.

The European Federation of Wooden Pallet and Packaging Manufacturers (FEFPEB) has advised that the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not have significant implications for customers using wood pallets and packaging for transport. The organization issued a statement to customers which requires businesses to prove products on the EU market have not been sourced from recently deforested land or contributed to its degradation. In a newsletter, the organisation said packaging would only become subject to the new EUDR rules when placed on the market for the first time as a standalone product, with its status changing as immediately when it is used. “As soon as the pallet or packaging is used to support, protect or carry another product, it is no longer covered by the EUDR.  …“Once the concerned packaging becomes a packaging material used exclusively as packaging… it is then not covered by the scope 27 of the Regulation.”