Intimidation is the mildest description of the reputation British Columbia has acquired after decades of radical environmental activism. On closer examination, the more appropriate word choice is violence. …I am certain that the actions of radical environmentalists in British Columbia over several decades…meet the World Health Organization’s definition of violence. One has to question the intent of the perpetrators of these crimes. They often claim they are attacking “big corporate interests.” But that is a lie. Corporate leaders are not on site… The violence and sabotage can only harm workers. …What about mainstream environmentalists? …It can’t be denied that those committing these crimes operate under the umbrella of the broader environmental movement. …The moral responsibility in this moment is for governments, First Nations, the environmental movement, communities, unions, corporations, and public institutions to come together to reverse the normalization of violence by radical groups and work to get things done in the best way possible.