
A New Brunswick court finds that First Nations can seek title to vast areas of private forest land. In other Business news: Trump nominates Michigan’s Pete Hoekstra to be ambassador to Canada; BC’s new forest minister takes the helm, as industry seeks focus on competitiveness; Tolko appeals logging road fine; ENGO’s raise concern over Domtar-APP link; West Fraser reduced logging plans for Bragg Creek; and Alberta Forest Products Association released its 2024 economic impact report.
In Forestry news: BC First Nations build new economy in Great Bear Sea; climbers in Oregon are collecting cones for future forests; and Dovetail report sheds light on the EUDR while EU diplomats reject amendments.
Finally, congratulations to the 2024 Forest Stewardship Council Leadership Award Winners!
Kelly McCloskey, Tree Frog Editor
[Yesterday, the Tree Frog News was bounced offline by the ‘bomb cyclone’ that hit the west coast. We send our gratitude to the hard working BC Hydro crews that restored our power, and the folks at Rogers/Shaw who later restored our internet services. We hope everyone else impacted by this rough weather got through it safely.]
Forestry and forest products provide a serious economic impact for our province. In addition to that, there’s the positive environmental impacts of proper forest management, the good jobs created for Alberta families, and the investment into the communities supported by the forestry and forest products industries. A recent study by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) highlights that, over the course of one year, Alberta’s forestry industry generated over $14.1 billion in economic activity as well as $2.8 billion in labour income in the province. The total impact figures found in this summary include the sum of direct, indirect and induced economic impacts on Alberta’s economic regions, as well as Alberta and Canada as a whole. Some 30,500 Albertans rely on the forestry industry for their livelihoods. These include workers in small- and mediumsized businesses, repair shops, restaurants, local hardware suppliers, environmental consultants, service providers, and more.
Leaders in two industries critical to rural and northern B.C. — mining and forestry — are calling on the new ministers in those areas to improve the regulatory competitiveness of those industries. …Parmar had asked Premier David Eby to head his ministry, having served in it as a senior ministerial advisor before entering elected politics. …Linda Coady, COFI CEO said her organization looks forward to working with Minister Parmar to take what she called “urgent actions”. Coady added it is important that new minister focus on “strengthening the competitiveness” of the forestry sector to support critical rural, resource-based workers, businesses, and communities, advance reconciliation with First Nations and ensure healthy biodiversity and ecosystem outcomes. A focus on three priorities can help achieve these goals, she added. The first concerns stabilizing and increasing fibre supply. …The second concerns securing new agreements with First Nations. …The third concerns forest management.

VERNON, BC — Tolko Industries continues to dispute a $75,000 fine after a logging road it built is claimed to have caused a landslide. In question is a logging road constructed by Tolko Industries in 2011. It’s alleged the road ultimately led to a landslide in May 2017 resulting in the administrative fine. Following the issuance of the fine in 2022, Tolko launched an appeal. Most recently, legal wrangling between Tolko and the province is centring around a variety of documents, including slide inspections. The 
Member states close the door to further tweaks to the new deforestation rules pushed by unusual right-wing majority in the European Parliament. EU diplomats have rejected European Parliament amendments to the Commission’s proposal to push back the entry into force of the bloc’s new deforestation rules by one year. Instead, member states insist on adhering to the original text. …Among the amendments, MEPs sought to introduce a new classification for countries posing “no risk” of deforestation, alongside the existing categories of low, standard, and high risk. However, in a meeting of EU ambassadors, member states reaffirmed they want to stick to the original proposal. “Opening the text would only generate legal uncertainty and huge time constraints,” the source continued. An interinstitutional meeting between MEPs and EU countries to hash out the divergences might take place as soon as tomorrow.
In this issue of the Health and Safety News you’ll find these and other headlines: